Shopping Cart

Your cart is empty.

Your cart is empty.

Boobrie Upgraded UHF PL259 Cable 49.2ft UHF Male to Male Cable CB Coax Cable Low Loss UHF PL259 Extension Cable for CB Ham Radio, Antenna| LMR200 Equivalent, Better Than RG58

Free shipping on orders over $29.99

$18.69

$ 9 .99 $9.99

In Stock

About this item

  • 👍【BOOBRIE Upgrade Coaxial Cable】LMR200 equivalent cable, better than RG58. Signal loss is lower than RG58 at the same frequency.
  • 👍【About Cables】Cable Type: UHF male to UHF male plug (pin) RF coaxial extension cable, Cable length: 49.2 Feet, Cable type: LMR200, Impedance: 50 ohm, Low-loss.
  • ⭐【BOOBRIE Upgraded UHF Cable Features】Compared to RG58, BOOBRIE upgraded cables have lower signal loss, higher frequency capability, and better durability, especially for applications with high performance requirements such as WiFi, cellular phones, and GPS. Please choose our upgraded cable.
  • 👍【Applications】Great for many projects which involves UHF connector. Widely used for Antennas, Broadcast, Radios, Wi-Fi, Telecom, Coaxial cable, LMR, Wireless LAN Devices, CCTV, Microwave Applications and Digital Communication System and so on, >1000 Times Mating Life Time.
  • 👍【Package & Service】1PCS 49.2ft UHF Male PL259 to Male PL-259 Upgraded Coaxial Cable. If you have any questions, please feel free to send us an email and we will be happy to answer them for you.



Product Description

200
58
uhf pl259
lmr200

Genskie
Reviewed in Canada on March 26, 2025
I like this product, still working right now
Vitor Ferreira
Reviewed in the United States on June 13, 2024
Works as it should
James Docheff
Reviewed in Canada on January 16, 2024
This cable is very light duty. I wouldn't use with any sort of real power. It will work for me as far as antenna build and tune. If you're looking for something to run on your set up permanently. Keep looking. It says rg58u. I highly doubt that. It is semi flexible and feels cheap. It is thinner than my old rg58u. I wouldn't run over 100 watts. Nor would I run over 50 ft max. Now with that being said. It was delivered promptly. In good shape. It tested good on the bench for continuity overall appearance and build. I have used it with 4 watt input at a 65ft run. It held swr (1- 1.5) and power readings approximately 1/2 watt loss at this length just randomly laid on ground loose coils. The next move is yours.
Robert Childers
Reviewed in the United States on January 1, 2024
Ok
Wayne Harris
Reviewed in Canada on February 14, 2023
Prompt delivery, did the job 100%.
Zed_the_Shredder
Reviewed in Canada on December 15, 2023
DON'T BUY THIS. The coax I received is solid center conductor. The left panel pictures clearly show this product with a stranded center conductor. Solid conductors are much more difficult to run in confined spaces with twists and turns. Ergo, stranded solves that. What Amazon shipped to me is as flexible as thick baling wire. Amazon needs to up their game with coax suppliers. The entry level coax sold in the recent past was very good quality. I have two 100' runs of rg58 with BNC ends and it is very flexible, durable, easy to run coax which only cost $20/100'. Where is the equivalent to that now? I have tried 4 different recent iterations of "quality rg58 coax" only to be deeply disappointed. I'm going to turn to the used market in the hopes I can secure 40 year old coax which has lived indoors.
Jeff®
Reviewed in the United States on January 23, 2023
Cable is legit with soldered terminals.
Stephen Kellar
Reviewed in the United States on September 2, 2021
Typical RG-58 coax. Good value. Not as good as RG8 but it seems to be transmitting and receiving well without much loss. Anything over 50' and you need the thick stuff.
Thomas M
Reviewed in the United States on August 4, 2021
Worked well for me cut in half for a 40m wire dipole and a 2m pipe dipole, has nice copper braiding. I like it, i'll probably get more, nice cheap feedline
Red Green
Reviewed in Canada on May 4, 2021
Works well, seems to be quality. I’m using it for HF lower frequencies so loss isn’t huge on those. But it does the trick. I haven’t done any serious analysis but it works.
John W. Owens
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2021
The item ordered more than suited my needs.
Luis Miranda Kunert
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2020
I am definetely comformed with this vendor The item corresponds with it is shown at website. I bougth 2 of them, They seem to be in-good weld. Also the length is the same as it is offer.
1greywolf
Reviewed in the United States on April 5, 2020
As soon as I got it I installed it between a transmitter and antenna. It worked just great. I put about 180 watts, got a very low SWR 1.15 and had no problems. The connectors are tight and well installed. The cable itself is rigid and easy to keep from getting twisted.